4.5 Article

FRETboard: Semisupervised classification of FRET traces

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 120, 期 16, 页码 3253-3260

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.030

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter, vrije programma (Single Molecule Protein Sequencing)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

FRET is a useful phenomenon in biomolecular investigations for nanoscale measurements, and a semisupervised approach with the web tool FRETboard has been proposed to fit models more intuitively. This approach accurately reproduces ground truth FRET statistics in simulated scenarios and retrieves parameters in vitro data in a fraction of the time required for manual classification. Additionally, FRETboard is designed to easily adapt to future developments in FRET measurement and analysis by being extendable to other models.
Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a useful phenomenon in biomolecular investigations, as it can be leveraged for nanoscale measurements. The optical signals produced by such experiments can be analyzed by fitting a statistical model. Several software tools exist to fit such models in an unsupervised manner but lack the flexibility to adapt to different experimental setups and require local installations. Here, we propose to fit models to optical signals more intuitively by adopting a semisupervised approach, in which the user interactively guides the model to fit a given data set, and introduce FRETboard, a web tool that allows users to provide such guidance. We show that our approach is able to closely reproduce ground truth FRET statistics in a wide range of simulated single-molecule scenarios and correctly estimate parameters for up to 11 states. On in vitro data, we retrieve parameters identical to those obtained by laborious manual classification in a fraction of the required time. Moreover, we designed FRETboard to be easily extendable to other models, allowing it to adapt to future developments in FRET measurement and analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据