4.5 Article

Discovery of thiazolidin-4-one analogue as selective GSK-3β inhibitor through structure based virtual screening

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128375

关键词

Glycogen synthase kinase3 beta; Structure-based virtual screening; Protein kinase assay; Molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. Central University of Rajasthan
  2. ADMET Predictor software facilities, Department of Science and Technology, Rajasthan [L7 (3) ST/RD/2016/2616]
  3. Asinex Corporation
  4. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, India, for the Senior Research Fellowship [09/1131(0004)/2016-EMR-I, 09/1131(0026)/2019-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified new GSK-3 beta inhibitors with potential in Alzheimer's disease pathology, among which ZINC09036109 showed promising selectivity and strong binding affinity with GSK-3 beta.
GSK-3 beta directly phosphorylate tubulin binding site of tau protein, indicating its importance in tau aggregation and, therefore, in Alzheimer's disease pathology. New GSK-3 beta inhibitors were identified using a structure-based screening, ADMET analysis. These studies revealed that ZINC09036109, ZINC72371723, ZINC72371725, and ZINC01373165 approached optimal ADMET properties along with good MM-GBSA dG binding. Protein kinase assays of these compounds against eight disease-relevant kinases were performed. During disease-relevant kinase profiling, ZINC09036109 ((E)-2-((3,4-dimethylphenyl)imino)-5-(3-methoxy-4-(naphthalen-2-ylmethoxy)benzyl) thiazolidin-4-one) emerged as a selective GSK-3 beta inhibitor with more than 10-fold selectivity over other disease-relevant kinases. Molecular dynamics study of ZINC09036109 molecule revealed interactions with Ile62, Phe67, Val135, Leu188, Asp200 amino acid residues of the binding site of GSK-3 beta, which were highly comparable to the co-crystallized molecule and hence validating comparative better activity of this compound compared to overall screened molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据