4.7 Review

Potential therapeutic agents to COVID-19: An update review on antiviral therapy, immunotherapy, and cell therapy

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111518

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Antiviral therapy Immunotherapy; Cell therapy; Nanomedicine; Antivirals

资金

  1. national COVID-19 committee of the National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB) , Tehran, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various treatment strategies have been explored for COVID-19, including vaccines, antiviral drugs, immunotherapy, etc. Each treatment method has its own advantages and disadvantages, which need to be carefully considered in the treatment of COVID-19.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2020 and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) was later announced as pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). Since then, several studies have been conducted on the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 by potential vaccines and drugs. Although, the governments and global population have been attracted by some vaccine production projects, the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antiviral drugs would be an urge necessity in parallel with the efficient preventive vaccines. Various nonspecific drugs produced previously against other bacterial, viral, and parasite infections were recently evaluated for treating patients with COVID-19. In addition to therapeutic properties of these anti-COVID-19 compounds, some adverse effects were observed in different human organs as well. Not only several attentions were paid to antiviral therapy and treatment of COVID-19, but also nanomedicine, immunotherapy, and cell therapy were conducted against this viral infection. In this review study, we planned to introduce the present and potential future treatment strategies against COVID-19 and define the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据