4.6 Article

Machine learning and regression analysis for diagnosis of bruxism by using EMG signals of jaw muscles

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102905

关键词

Bruxism; Muscle fatigue; Surface electromyography; Neural networks; Machine learning algorithms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bruxism is a common condition characterized by rhythmic clenching of the lower jaw during sleep, causing fatigue and pain in jaw muscles, tooth wear, and difficulty in diagnosis and treatment. Different algorithms, including K-nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network, have been shown to increase the accuracy of bruxism diagnosis through surface electromyography (sEMG) signal analysis.
Bruxism is known as the rhythmical clenching of the lower jaw (mandibular) by involuntary contraction of the masticatory muscles (masseter muscles) together with parafunctional grinding of the teeth that usually occur during sleep. It affects patients' quality of life adversely due to tooth wear, tooth loss, and pain and fatigue in the jaw muscles. It is a common condition that is difficult to diagnose and treat. Bruxism diagnosis is often made by monitoring electromyography (EMG) activity of the masseter muscles during sleep. In this study, fatigue and pain in lower jaw muscles are examined together with teeth grinding and clenching activities. 13 time- and frequencyrelated features that are widely used in the literature were extracted from EMG signals. Correlations between the features were determined through five different algorithms in addition to Artificial Neural Network, and the features with the highest correlation were grouped in different combinations. As a result of tests performed on these groups of features, most effective features to be used in surface electromyography (sEMG) signal analysis were identified. K-nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network algorithms are shown to increase the accuracy of bruxism diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据