4.6 Article

Stacking segment-based CNN with SVM for recognition of atrial fibrillation from single-lead ECG recordings

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102672

关键词

Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Atrial fibrillation; ECG; Recognition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify AF from short single-lead ECG recordings using a machine learning method. By stacking SVM on statistical features produced by a convolutional neural network, the model outperformed other state-of-the-art methods on the same dataset. This stacking method can be applied to other medical signal related problems without requiring expertise in ECG data analysis.
Background and objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac rhythm disorder. Early detection of AF can result in a lower risk of stroke, heart failure, systemic thromboembolism, and coronary artery disease. AF detection however is challenging due to the need for specialised equipment and professional technicians. Hand-held electrocardiogram (ECG) devices, including wearables, are now available and provide a potential mechanism for detecting AF. We wished to identify AF from short single-lead ECG recordings using a machine learning method. Methods: We predicted AF from ECG signals by stacking a support vector machine (SVM) on statistical features of segment-based recognition units produced by a convolutional neural network. We used the ECG dataset from the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2017, which contained 8528 ECG recordings, to validate our method. Results: ECG recordings were categorised into four classes with an average F1 score of 84.19% under fivefold cross-validations. Conclusions: Our model performed better than other state-of-the-art methods applied to the same dataset using the same metric. This stacking method can be generalised for other problems related to medical signals as it does not require expertise in analysing ECG data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据