4.4 Article

Simultaneous determination of meropenem and imipenem in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study

期刊

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5185

关键词

imipenem; interactions; liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; meropenem; pharmacokinetics; sulbactam

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province [2021AAC03345]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient and reliable LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of meropenem and imipenem in rat plasma was established and validated. This method was successfully applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics of intravenous injection of meropenem and imipenem in rats.
An efficient and reliable method using LC-MS/MS was established and validated for the simultaneous quantification of meropenem and imipenem in rat plasma. An electronic spray ion source in the positive multiple reaction monitoring mode was used for the detection and the transitions were m/z 384.6 -> m/z 141.2 for meropenem, m/z 300.1 -> m/z 141.8 for imipenem and m/z 423.4 -> m/z 207.1 for matrine (IS). The calibration curves of meropenem and imipenem were linear in the range of 0.50-200 mu g/mL. Satisfactory separation was achieved with a total run time of 3.0 min, the injection volume was 3 mu l. The retention times of meropenem, imipenem and IS were 1.19, 1.14 and 1.13 min, respectively. Meropenem and imipenem are easily hydrolyzed in plasma. HEPES was used as a stabilizer and added to the plasma samples immediately after centrifugation. Extractions of meropenem, imipenem and IS were carried out by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The specificity, precision and accuracy, stability, recovery and matrix effects were within acceptance limits. This method was successfully applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics of intravenous injection of meropenem and imipenem single administration or combined with sulbactam in rats. We found that sulbactam has no influence on the pharmacokinetics behavior of meropenem or imipenem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据