4.8 Article

Multiscale rheology of glioma cells

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120903

关键词

Microrheology; Viscoelasticity; Glioblastoma; Nucleus; Cytoskeleton; Intermediate filaments

资金

  1. UPMC University Paris 6 (Programme Doctoral Interfaces Pour le Vivant)
  2. La Ligue Contre le Cancer
  3. Institut Curie
  4. CNRS
  5. INSERM Plan Cancer 2009-2013 INSERM CEA Tecsan [PC201125]
  6. labex [ANR-11-LABX-0071]
  7. Universite de Paris, Idex - French Government through its program [ANR-18IDEX-0001]
  8. labex Cell(n)Scale [ANR-11-LABX-0038, ANR-10IDEX-0001-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells tend to soften during cancer progression, and mechanical phenotyping could be used as a diagnostic or prognostic method. By investigating the cell mechanics of gliomas, research shows that cell mechanics discriminates human glioma cells of different grades, suggesting the potential of combining rheology techniques for cancer cell mechanophenotyping in diagnostic or prognostic methods.
Cells tend to soften during cancer progression, suggesting that mechanical phenotyping could be used as a diagnostic or prognostic method. Here we investigate the cell mechanics of gliomas, brain tumors that originate from glial cells or glial progenitors. Using two microrheology techniques, a single-cell parallel plates rheometer to probe whole-cell mechanics and optical tweezers to probe intracellular rheology, we show that cell mechanics discriminates human glioma cells of different grades. When probed globally, grade IV glioblastoma cells are softer than grade III astrocytoma cells, while they are surprisingly stiffer at the intracellular level. We explain this difference between global and local intracellular behaviours by changes in the composition and spatial organization of the cytoskeleton, and by changes in nuclear mechanics. Our study highlights the need to combine rheology techniques for potential diagnostic or prognostic methods based on cancer cell mechanophenotyping.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据