4.6 Article

Biomarkers of alopecia areata disease activity and response to corticosteroid treatment

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 282-286

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/exd.12918

关键词

alopecia areata; biomarkers; hair keratins; inflammatory cytokines

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000043] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR024143] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32GM07739] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common inflammatory disease targeting the anagen-stage hair follicle. Different cytokines have been implicated in the disease profile, but their pathogenic role is not yet fully determined. We studied biopsies of pretreatment lesional and non-lesional (NL) scalp and post-treatment (intra-lesional steroid injection) lesional scalp of 6 patchy patients with AA using immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis. Immunohistochemistry showed increases in CD3(+), CD8(+) T cells, CD11c(+) dendritic cells and CD1a(+) Langerhans cells within and around hair follicles of pretreatment lesional scalp, which decreased upon treatment. qRT-PCR showed in pretreatment lesional scalp (compared to NL) significant increases (P < 0.05) in expression of inflammatory markers (IL-2, IL-2RA, JAK3, IL-15), Th1 (CXCL10 and CXCL9), Th2 (IL-13, CCL17 and CCL18), IL-12/IL-23p40 and IL-32. Among these, we observed significant downregulation with treatment in IL-12/IL-23p40, CCL18 and IL-32. We also observed significant downregulation of several hair keratins in lesional scalp, with significant upregulation of KRT35, KRT75 and KRT86 in post-treatment lesional scalp. This study shows concurrent activation of Th1 and Th2 immune axes as well as IL-23 and IL-32 cytokine pathways in lesional AA scalp and defined a series of response biomarkers to corticosteroid injection. Clinical trials with selective antagonists coupled with cytokine-pathway biomarkers will be necessary to further dissect pathogenic immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据