期刊
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109256
关键词
Behavioural science; Behaviour change; Interdisciplinarity; Conservation interventions; Nudging
资金
- Cambridge Conservation Initiative Collaborative Fund [CCI-05-19-002]
- Arcadia
- RSPB
- Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont
- Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit award
- NERC [NE/L002507/1]
Conservation efforts focus on changing human behavior, with limited application of recent advances in behavioral science. While behavioral science holds promise for biodiversity conservation, interventions aimed at behavior change may have modest, temporary effects that are context-dependent. More research is needed to understand the effectiveness and limitations of these tools.
Conservation is predominantly an exercise in trying to change human behaviour - whether that of consumers whose choices drive unsustainable resource use, of land managers clearing natural habitats, or of policymakers failing to deliver on environmental commitments. Yet conservation research and practice have made only limited use of recent advances in behavioural science, including more novel behaviour change interventions. Instead conservationists mostly still rely on traditional behaviour change interventions - education, regulation and material incentivisation - largely without applying recent insights from behavioural science about how to improve such approaches. This paper explores how behavioural science could be more widely and powerfully applied in biodiversity conservation. We consider the diverse cast of actors involved in conservation problems and the resulting breadth of behaviour change that conservationists might want to achieve. Drawing on health research, we present a catalogue of types of interventions for changing behaviour, considering both novel, standalone interventions and the enhancement of more traditional conservation interventions. We outline a framework for setting priorities among interventions based on their likely impact, using ideas developed for climate change mitigation. We caution that, despite its promise, behavioural science is not a silver bullet for conservation. The effects of interventions aimed at changing behaviour can be modest, temporary, and context dependent in ways that are as-yet poorly understood. We therefore close with a call for interventions to be tested and the findings widely disseminated to enable researchers and practitioners to build a much-needed evidence base on the effectiveness and limitations of these tools.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据