4.7 Article

DisoLipPred: accurate prediction of disordered lipid-binding residues in protein sequences with deep recurrent networks and transfer learning

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 115-124

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab640

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1617369]
  2. Robert J. Mattauch Endowment funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DisoLipPred is the first predictor of disordered lipid-binding residues, utilizing innovative features including transfer learning, a bypass module, and expanded inputs to improve predictive quality. The results are accurate and surpass existing tools, providing complementary predictions to current methods.
Motivation: Intrinsically disordered protein regions interact with proteins, nucleic acids and lipids. Regions that bind lipids are implicated in a wide spectrum of cellular functions and several human diseases. Motivated by the growing amount of experimental data for these interactions and lack of tools that can predict them from the protein sequence, we develop DisoLipPred, the first predictor of the disordered lipid-binding residues (DLBRs). Results: DisoLipPred relies on a deep bidirectional recurrent network that implements three innovative features: transfer learning, bypass module that sidesteps predictions for putative structured residues, and expanded inputs that cover physiochemical properties associated with the protein-lipid interactions. Ablation analysis shows that these features drive predictive quality of DisoLipPred. Tests on an independent test dataset and the yeast proteome reveal that DisoLipPred generates accurate results and that none of the related existing tools can be used to indirectly identify DLBR. We also show that DisoLipPred's predictions complement the results generated by predictors of the transmembrane regions. Altogether, we conclude that DisoLipPred provides high-quality predictions of DLBRs that complement the currently available methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据