4.7 Article

VeloViz: RNA velocity-informed embeddings for visualizing cellular trajectories

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 391-396

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab653

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [2047611]
  2. National Institutes of Health [T32-GM136577]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [2047611] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

VeloViz is a tool that can create 2D and 3D embeddings based on RNA velocity information, capturing underlying cellular trajectories across diverse trajectory topologies and helping visualize a more reliable representation of cellular trajectories.
Motivation: Single-cell transcriptomics profiling technologies enable genome-wide gene expression measurements in individual cells but can currently only provide a static snapshot of cellular transcriptional states. RNA velocity analysis can help infer cell state changes using such single-cell transcriptomics data. To interpret these cell state changes inferred from RNA velocity analysis as part of underlying cellular trajectories, current approaches rely on visualization with principal components, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding and other 2D embeddings derived from the observed single-cell transcriptional states. However, these 2D embeddings can yield different representations of the underlying cellular trajectories, hindering the interpretation of cell state changes. Results: We developed VeloViz to create RNA velocity-informed 2D and 3D embeddings from single-cell transcriptomics data. Using both real and simulated data, we demonstrate that VeloViz embeddings are able to capture underlying cellular trajectories across diverse trajectory topologies, even when intermediate cell states may be missing. By considering the predicted future transcriptional states from RNA velocity analysis, VeloViz can help visualize a more reliable representation of underlying cellular trajectories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据