4.4 Review

Minimal metabolism: A key concept to investigate the origins and nature of biological systems

期刊

BIOESSAYS
卷 43, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bies.202100103

关键词

autonomous control; constructive self-maintenance; functional bootstrapping; metabolism; origins of life; prebiotic systems chemistry; rule-based computational chemistry

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 Marie Curie ITN (ProtoMet) [813873]
  2. Basque Government [IT 122819]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-104576GB-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past two decades, there has been increased scientific attention on metabolism in relation to the systems view on life and its emergence from complex chemistry. However, there has been a lack of theoretical discussion on the nature and role of metabolism in biogenesis. This critical review aims to encourage further investigations on metabolism, particularly in the context of life's origin, presenting a contrast between minimal metabolism and previous top-down conceptions.
The systems view on life and its emergence from complex chemistry has remarkably increased the scientific attention on metabolism in the last two decades. However, during this time there has not been much theoretical discussion on what constitutes a metabolism and what role it actually played in biogenesis. A critical and updated review on the topic is here offered, including some references to classical models from last century, but focusing more on current and future research. Metabolism is considered as intrinsically related to the living but not necessarily equivalent to it. More precisely, the idea of minimal metabolism, in contrast to previous, top-down conceptions, is formulated as a heuristic construct, halfway between chemistry and biology. Thus, rather than providing a complete or final characterization of metabolism, our aim is to encourage further investigations on it, particularly in the context of life's origin, for which some concrete methodological suggestions are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据