4.4 Article

Host under epigenetic control: A novel perspective on the interaction between microorganisms and corals

期刊

BIOESSAYS
卷 43, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bies.202100068

关键词

beneficial bacteria; coral; epigenetics; global change; microbiome manipulation; resilience; probiotics

资金

  1. Shell Brasil under the ANP R&D levy as 'Compromisso de Investimentos com Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento'
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. CoordenacAo de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research is currently focused on understanding how microbial communities and epigenetic changes affect the phenotype and gene expression of corals. It has been hypothesized that coral-associated microorganisms may influence the coral's phenotypic response by modulating its epigenome. Findings suggest that manipulating the microbiome could be a potential means to alter the coral’s epigenome and assist in coral reef protection efforts.
Coral reefs have been challenged by the current rate and severity of environmental change that might outpace their ability to adapt and survive. Current research focuses on understanding how microbial communities and epigenetic changes separately affect phenotypes and gene expression of corals. Here, we provide the hypothesis that coral-associated microorganisms may directly or indirectly affect the coral's phenotypic response through the modulation of its epigenome. Homologs of ankyrin-repeat protein A and internalin B, which indirectly cause histone modifications in humans, as well as Rv1988 histone methyltransferase, and the DNA methyltransferases Rv2966c, Mhy1, Mhy2, and Mhy3 found in coral-associated bacteria indicate that there are potential host epigenome-modifying proteins in the coral microbiome. With the ideas presented here, we suggest that microbiome manipulation may be a means to alter a coral's epigenome, which could aid the current efforts to protect coral reefs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据