4.7 Article

Epitope-imprinted polydopamine electrochemical sensor for ovalbumin detection

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107805

关键词

Epitope imprinting; Polydopamine; Screen printed carbon electrode; Ovalbumin; Gold nanoparticles

资金

  1. Royal Thai Government
  2. Asian Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel electrochemical sensor based on epitope-imprinted polydopamine was developed for sensitive and selective detection of ovalbumin. The sensor showed excellent sensitivity, a wide linear range, and good selectivity against other proteins, making it suitable for detecting allergic proteins in the food supply chain.
A novel, sensitive and selective electrochemical sensor based on epitope-imprinted polydopamine (PDA) was developed for ovalbumin (OVA) detection. Molecularly imprinted polydopamine was synthesized on an AuNP-coated screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) via electropolymerization in the presence of OVA IgE-binding epitope as the template. Key process parameters including template concentration, electropolymerization cycle, pH, time required for template removal and rebinding were optimized. Electrochemical detection of OVA was performed by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) in 5 mM K3Fe(CN)(6) and 0.1 M KCl as the supporting electrolyte. Under optimized conditions, the sensor demonstrated excellent sensitivity toward OVA with linear range from 23.25 to 232.50 nM (1 to 10 ppm), limit of detection (LOD) of 10.76 nM (0.46 ppm), and limit of quantification (LOQ) of 35.87 nM (1.54 ppm). The sensor also exhibited good selectivity against other proteins such as human serum albumin (HSA), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and lysozyme (LYZ). OVA in wine samples was detected with RSD of 5.63-10.82%, and recovery percentage of 104.74-105.96%. The developed method can be easily adapted to detect other allergic proteins in the food supply chain. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据