4.6 Review

The roles of small extracellular vesicles in lung cancer: Molecular pathology, mechanisms, diagnostics, and therapeutics

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188539

关键词

Extracellular vesicles; Lung cancer; Molecular pathology; Diagnostics; Therapeutics

资金

  1. Precision Medicine Project of Wuxi Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [J201805]
  2. Youth scientific research project of Wuxi Municipal Health Commission [Q201951]
  3. Top Talent Support Program for young and middle-aged people of Wuxi Health Committee [HB2020003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

sEVs are submicron-sized particles released from cells, carrying tissue-specific molecules and playing important roles in tumors. Research indicates their potential for diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring in cancer.
Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are submicron-sized, lipid-bilayer-enclosed particles that are released from cells. A variety of tissue-specific molecules, including proteins, DNA fragments, RNA, lipids, and metabolites, can be selectively encapsulated into sEVs and delivered to nearby and distant recipient cells. Incontestable and growing evidence shows the important biological roles and the clinical relevance of sEVs in tumors. In particular, recent studies validate sEVs can be used for early tumor diagnostics, staging, and treatment monitoring. Moreover, sEVs have been used as drug delivery nanocarriers, cancer vaccines, and antigen conferrers. While still in its infancy, the field of sEV-based fundamental and translational studies has been rapidly advancing. This review comprehensively examines the latest sEV-related studies in lung cancers, encompassing extracellular vesicles and their roles in lung cancer pathophysiology, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The state-of-the-art technologies for sEV isolation, downstream molecular analyses, and sEV-based therapies indicate their potency as tools for understanding the pathology and promising clinical management of lung cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据