4.4 Review

Advances in microglia cellular models: focus on extracellular vesicle production

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 1791-1802

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20210203

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microglia are essential components of the innate immune system in the central nervous system, playing a crucial role in maintaining brain homeostasis and modulating inflammatory processes. The functions exerted by microglial EVs in pathological conditions highlight their importance in cell-to-cell communication, potentially promoting both protective and harmful effects.
Microglia are the major component of the innate immune system in the central nervous system. They promote the maintenance of brain homeostasis as well as support inflammatory processes that are often related to pathological conditions such as neurodegenerative diseases. Depending on the stimulus received, microglia cells dynamically change their phenotype releasing specific soluble factors and largely modify the cargo of their secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs). Despite the mechanisms at the basis of microglia actions have not been completely clarified, the recognized functions exerted by their EVs in patho-physiological conditions represent the proof of the crucial role of these organelles in tuning cell-to-cell communication, promoting either protective or harmful effects. Consistently, in vitro cell models to better elucidate microglia EV production and mechanisms of their release have been increased in the last years. In this review, the main microglial cellular models that have been developed and validated will be described and discussed, with particular focus on those used to produce and derive EVs. The advantages and disadvantages of their use will be evidenced too. Finally, given the wide interest in applying EVs in diagnosis and therapy too, the heterogeneity of available models for producing microglia EVs is here underlined, to prompt a cross-check or comparison among them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据