4.7 Article

Household indoor microplastics within the Humber region (United Kingdom): Quantification and chemical characterisation of particles present

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118512

关键词

mu FTIR; Synthetic; Indoor; Home; Air

资金

  1. University of Hull

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found higher concentrations of suspended microplastics (MPs) indoors compared to outdoor environments, with smaller, fibrous particles being the most abundant indoors. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was the most common type of MPs observed, accounting for 62% of the total.
Knowledge regarding the presence of suspended microplastics (MPs) within the air is lacking, especially indoors, yet the importance of indoor air quality and human health is rising. This study is the first to report MPs within multiple homes over a 6-month period, with concentrations exceeding previous outdoor studies. Twenty households, within the City of Hull and Humber region, U.K., were passively sampled, each month, collecting atmospheric fallout at head height for subsequent particle quantification, characterisation and mu FTIR validation (n = 3061). A household average of 1414 MP m 2 day 1 +/- 1022 (mean +/- SD) was observed. Smaller (5-250 mu m), fibrous, particles were the most abundant (90%), representing types most likely to enter the human body and cause physiological harm. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was present in 90% of samples and accounted for 62% of MPs. Additionally, polyamide (PA) and polypropylene (PP) were common. Results indicate that humans are exposed to significantly (1-45 times) higher concentrations, and ranges, of MPs within homes compared with the outdoor environment. In conclusion, the size range and types of MPs observed will inform laboratory experiments, using either human tissue culture or other approaches. This will allow determination of the wider implications on human health using realistic levels and representative types of indoor MPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据