4.3 Article

Concentration in vanishing adiabatic exponent limit of solutions to the Aw-Rascle traffic model

期刊

ASYMPTOTIC ANALYSIS
卷 129, 期 2, 页码 179-213

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/ASY-211725

关键词

Aw-Rascle traffic model; Riemann solutions; delta shock wave; vanishing adiabatic exponent limit; zero pressure gas dynamics; weighted Dirac-measure; numerical simulations

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2019J01642]
  2. Research Foundation of Fuzhou University [FDJG20190027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the concentration phenomenon and the formation of delta shock wave in the vanishing adiabatic exponent limit of Riemann solutions to the Aw-Rascle traffic model. It is proven that as the adiabatic exponent tends to zero, the limit of solutions tends to a special delta-shock rather than the classical one in zero pressure gas dynamics. By considering a perturbed Aw-Rascle model, it is rigorously proved that as the adiabatic exponent tends to one, any Riemann solution containing two shock waves tends to a delta-shock to the zero pressure gas dynamics. Representative numerical simulations are also presented to confirm the theoretical analysis.
In this paper, we study the phenomenon of concentration and the formation of delta shock wave in vanishing adiabatic exponent limit of Riemann solutions to the Aw-Rascle traffic model. It is proved that as the adiabatic exponent vanishes, the limit of solutions tends to a special delta-shock rather than the classical one to the zero pressure gas dynamics. In order to further study this problem, we consider a perturbed Aw-Rascle model and proceed to investigate the limits of solutions. We rigorously proved that, as the adiabatic exponent tends to one, any Riemann solution containing two shock waves tends to a delta-shock to the zero pressure gas dynamics in the distribution sense. Moreover, some representative numerical simulations are exhibited to confirm the theoretical analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据