4.7 Article

Flare-induced Photospheric Velocity Diagnostics

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 915, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfda8

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Community [606862]
  2. Research Council of Norway
  3. Science Technology Funding Council (STFC) [ST/T506369/1]
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/P000304/1, ST/T00021X/1]
  5. Science and Technologies Facilities Council (UK) [ST/N004981/2]
  6. Ser Cymru II scheme - European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that perturbations induced in photospheric Fe i lines by electron beam heating result in discernible differences in photospheric velocities, with a red asymmetry of up to 40 m s(-1). However, the overall redshift in line profile is actually produced by significant chromospheric emission blueshifted by as much as 400 m s(-1).
We present radiative-hydrodynamic simulations of solar flares generated by the RADYN and RH codes to study the perturbations induced in photospheric Fe i lines by electron beam heating. We investigate how variations in the beam parameters result in discernible differences in the induced photospheric velocities. Line synthesis revealed a significant chromospheric contribution to the line profiles resulting in an apparent red asymmetry by as much as 40 m s(-1) close to the time of maximum beam heating, which was not reflective of the upflow velocities that arose from the radiative-hydrodynamic simulations at those times. The apparent redshift to the overall line profile was produced by significant chromospheric emission that was blueshifted by as much as 400 m s(-1) and fills in the blue side of the near-stationary photospheric absorption profile. The velocity information that can be retrieved from photospheric line profiles during flares must therefore be treated with care to mitigate the effects of higher parts of the atmosphere providing an erroneous velocity signal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据