4.7 Article

A Plasmoid model for the Sgr A* Flares Observed With Gravity and CHANDRA

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 917, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf8ae

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [AST-1715061, TM6-17006X, PIRE 1743747]
  2. NASA [ATP 80NSSC20K0521]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the study of flares from the Galactic Center black hole Sgr A*, proposing a model of plasmoids forming and orbiting around the black hole, and using general-relativistic radiative-transfer calculations to obtain the structure of flare light curves. The model can explain the motion of flare light curves and their correlation with the position of the black hole.
The Galactic Center black hole Sgr A* shows significant variability and flares in the submillimeter, infrared, and X-ray wavelengths. Owing to its exquisite resolution in the IR bands, the GRAVITY experiment for the first time spatially resolved the locations of three flares and showed that a bright region moves in ellipse-like trajectories close to, but offset from, the black hole over the course of each event. We present a model for plasmoids that form during reconnection events and orbit in the coronal region around a black hole to explain these observations. We utilize general-relativistic radiative-transfer calculations that include effects from finite light travel time, plasmoid motion, particle acceleration, and synchrotron cooling, and obtain a rich structure in the flare light curves. This model can naturally account for the observed motion of the bright regions observed by the GRAVITY experiment and the offset between the center of the centroid motion and the position of the black hole. It also explains why some flares may be double peaked while others have only a single peak and uncovers a correlation between the structure in the light curve and the location of the flare. Finally, we make predictions for future observations of flares from the inner accretion flow of Sgr A* that will provide a test of this model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据