4.7 Article

Characterizing Solar Surface Convection Using Doppler Measurements

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 916, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac05bc

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilizes data from the Solar Dynamics Observatory to obtain multiscale convective spectra, infer poloidal and toroidal flow spectra through a designed pipeline, and finds a preference for latitudinal convective flows based on peak power in the poloidal flow spectrum. Vertical motion power increases with wavenumber, reaching 8% at l = 1500, and the flows show nearly no temporal-frequency dependence.
The Helioseismic Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory records line-of-sight Dopplergram images of convective flows on the surface. These images are used to obtain the multiscale convective spectrum. We design a pipeline to process the raw images to remove large-scale features like differential rotation, meridional circulation, limb shift, and imaging artifacts. The Hierarchical Equal Area Pixelization scheme is used to perform spherical harmonic transforms on the cleaned image. Because we only have access to line-of-sight velocities on half the solar surface, we define a mixing matrix to relate the observed and true spectra. This enables the inference of poloidal and toroidal flow spectra in a single step through the inversion of the mixing matrix. Performing inversions on a number of flow profiles, we find that the poloidal flow recovery is most reliable among all the components. We also find that the poloidal spectrum is in qualitative agreement with inferences from Local Correlation Tracking of granules. The fraction of power in vertical motions increases as a function of wavenumber and is at the 8% level for l = 1500. In contrast to seismic results and LCT, the flows show nearly no temporal-frequency dependence. Poloidal flow power peaks in the range of l - vertical bar m vertical bar approximate to 150-250, which may potentially hint at a latitudinal preference for convective flows.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据