3.9 Article

Toxic effects of copper sulfate and copper nanoparticles on minerals, enzymes, thyroid hormones and protein fractions of plasma and histopathology in common carp Cyprinus carpio

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 493-503

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2016.08.002

关键词

Copper; Nanoparticle; Plasma enzymes; Thyroid hormones; Plasma protein fractions; Histopathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differences in toxicological effects of dissolved copper and copper nanoparticles were studied in common carp, Cyprinus carpio. The fish were exposed to 0.25 mg L-1 copper as copper sulfate (0.25Cu), 0.25 mg L-1 copper as copper oxide nanoparticles (0.25NCu) and 25 mg L-1 copper as copper oxide nanoparticles (25NCu) over 14 days. Plasma biochemical, enzymatic and hormonal characteristics, and liver and kidney histopathology were examined at the end of the experiment. The results showed that both forms of copper had no significant effects on plasma calcium levels, however, significantly increased plasma phosphorous levels, compared to control group (no added copper). Plasma alanine transaminase (ALT) activity increased in 0.25Cu and 25NCu treatments compared to the control and 0.25NCu treatments. Nanoparticle copper exposure significantly decreased plasma alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity compared to the control and 0.25Cu treatments. Only copper sulfate exposure caused plasma aspartate transaminase (AST) elevation. Both copper forms increased plasma T-4 and free T-4 (FT4); however, copper sulfate effect was higher than nanoparticle copper. Copper sulfate exposure increased plasma albumin fraction, whereas, 25 mgL(-1) copper nanoparticle exposure increased plasma alpha(2)-globulin fraction compared to the control. Both copper forms damaged the fish liver and kidney, however, copper sulfate caused more severe damages compared to nanoparticle copper. Overall, except for plasma ALP and alpha(2)-globulin fraction, dissolved copper seems to be more toxic than nanoparticle copper in common carp. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据