4.6 Article

Herschel Photometric Observations of Little Things Dwarf Galaxies

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 162, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/abfd2e

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA JPL RSA [1433776]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) in the form of Consolidator Grant COSMICDUST [ERC-2014-CoG-647939]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) through the program SYMPATICO [ANR-11-BS56-0023]
  4. EU FP7 project DustPedia [606847]
  5. Programme National Physique et Chimie du Milieu Interstellaire (PCMI) of CNRS/INSU
  6. National Science Foundation [AST-1907492]
  7. CEA
  8. CNES
  9. INC/INP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the far-infrared photometry of low-metallicity dwarf galaxies with moderate star formation rates, finding that they have low dust masses and cooler dust temperatures with low dust-to-gas mass ratios. These galaxies are likely forming very little dust via stars or grain growth and have very high dust destruction rates.
We present here far-infrared photometry of galaxies in a sample that is relatively unexplored at these wavelengths: low-metallicity dwarf galaxies with moderate star formation rates. Four dwarf irregular galaxies from the Little Things survey are considered, with deep Herschel PACS and SPIRE observations at 100, 160, 250, 350, and 500 mu m. Results from modified blackbody fits indicate that these galaxies have low dust masses and cooler dust temperatures than more actively star-forming dwarfs, occupying the lowest L (TIR) and M (dust) regimes seen among these samples. Dust-to-gas mass ratios of similar to 10(-5) are lower, overall, than in more massive and active galaxies but are roughly consistent with the broken power-law relation between the dust-to-gas ratio and metallicity found for other low-metallicity systems. Chemical evolution modeling suggests that these dwarf galaxies are likely forming very little dust via stars or grain growth and have very high dust destruction rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据