4.6 Article

Partial primary closure in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: Modified with suture technique

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 381-385

出版社

ELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.029

关键词

Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus surgery; Partial primer closure; Karydakis technique

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the outcomes of the Karydakis flap technique and the partial primary closure technique for pilonidal sinus disease treatment. The results showed that the partial primary closure group had shorter hospitalization stay, longer healing time, and similar complication rates compared to the Karydakis technique.
Aim and background: The primary purpose of pilonidal sinus treatment is to minimize complications, accelerate wound healing, and minimize recurrence. However, invasive and minimally invasive methods are being developed to reduce these problems. Early and late postoperative complications remain significant problems in pilonidal surgery. This study aimed to contribute to this issue in surgery by comparing the results of the Karydakis flap (KF) technique and those of the partial primary closure (PPC) technique, to which we applied suture modification. Methods: A total of 96 patients diagnosed with pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) were randomly assigned to two groups. Apply the partial primary closure in 46 patients and the Karydakis technique in 50. Results: In comparison to the Karydakis technique, the partial primary closure (PPC) group's hospitalization stay was shorter, although the difference was not significant. Healing time was also longer in uncomplicated cases (p 1/4 0.200 and 0.064, respectively). Abscesses and hematomas were not observed with partial primary closure, but the total complication rate was similar to that of the Karydakis technique. Surgical site infections were often seen in the PPC group (21.7% vs. 10%). In contrast, healing time for complicated cases was found to be significantly shorter in the PPC technique (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Postoperative abscess, hematoma, and seroma are the most common causes of total wound dehiscence, and delay in wound healing in off-midline techniques. We recommend the PPC technique with suture modification as an alternative to off-midline techniques in clean and chronically infected cases, other than cellulitis, abscess, and purulent discharge cases. However, we primarily recommend offmidline techniques in clean or asymptomatic cases. (c) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据