4.3 Article

Experimental study on the influence of bionic channel structure on waste heat utilization equipment

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/apj.2668

关键词

bionic surface; enhanced heat transfer; heat exchanger; nanofluids

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51606214]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20181359]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the utilization of nanofluids on bionic surfaces in waste heat utilization equipment, finding that the heat transfer capacity of nanofluids is closely related to factors such as nanofluid mass fraction, angular frequency, amplitude, and phase shift. In terms of overall performance, a higher angular frequency, amplitude, and phase shift lead to better performance of the heat exchanger.
In this paper, in order to improve the efficiency of waste heat utilization, based on the movement type and shape of the snake, snake bionic surfaces with different structures were designed, and CuO-H2O nanofluids were used instead of traditional working fluids, and they were coupled together and applied to waste heat utilization equipment. The main work is to experimentally study the effects of nanofluids mass fraction (w = 0.1 wt%, 0.3 wt%, 0.5 wt%), amplitude of bionic channel structure (A = 1 mm, A = 2 mm, A = 3 mm), angular frequency of bionic channel structure (omega = 20 rad/s, omega = 25 rad/s, omega = 30 rad/s), phase shift of bionic channel structure (alpha = 0 degrees, 90 degrees, 180 degrees), and Reynolds number (Re = 1,300-1800) on the flow and heat transfer characteristics of working fluid. It was found that the heat transfer capacity of nanofluids increases with nanofluids mass fraction, angular frequency, amplitude and phase shift. Finally, the comprehensive performance of the whole experimental system was studied, and it was found that the greater the angular frequency, amplitude and phase shift, the better the comprehensive performance of the heat exchanger.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据