4.4 Article

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannula-Related Infections: Epidemiology and Risk Factors

期刊

ASAIO JOURNAL
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 571-576

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001505

关键词

ECMO; cannula; nosocomial infections

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cannula-related infections (CRI) are a potential major source of infection in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of CRI among critically ill patients supported by ECMO and found that diabetes and ECMO duration were independently associated with CRI.
Although being a potential major source of infection in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients, data regarding cannula-related infections (CRI) remain scarce. We therefore aimed at describing the epidemiology of CRI among critically ill patients supported by ECMO. Between October 2017 and November 2019, adult patients supported by either venoarterial (VA), venopulmonary arterial, or venovenous (VV) ECMO for more than 24 hours were prospectively enrolled. When CRI was suspected, cannula swab and subcutaneous needle aspirate samples were obtained for microbiological culture. Cannula tips were systematically sent for culture at the time of ECMO removal. Primary end-point was CRI, which was defined by sepsis or local sign of cannula infection and at least one positive culture among swab, subcutaneous needle aspirate or tip. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors of CRI. Hundred patients were included, including 77 VA, 12 venopulmonary arterial, and 11 VV ECMO. Cannula-related infections were diagnosed after a median duration of ECMO of 10 [7-13] days. Rate of CRI was 24%, including 10% with bacteremia. Most frequent involved pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae (n = 14), Enterococci (n = 8), and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (n = 7). By multivariate analysis, diabetes and ECMO duration were independently associated with CRI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据