4.6 Article

Differential evolution and particle swarm optimization against COVID-19

期刊

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 2149-2219

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-021-10052-w

关键词

Particle swarm optimization; Differential evolution; Swarm intelligence; Evolutionary computation; Applications; COVID-19

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [3841/E-41/S/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper surveys the rapid publications of DE and PSO applications in 2020 related to COVID-19, and finds that these methods are mainly used for calibration of epidemiological models and image-based classification, with scarce methodological details reported, and choices may not always be appropriate. Research from the past two decades is overlooked, with the main factors influencing choice being citation numbers and code availability in various programming languages.
COVID-19 disease, which highly affected global life in 2020, led to a rapid scientific response. Versatile optimization methods found their application in scientific studies related to COVID-19 pandemic. Differential Evolution (DE) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are two metaheuristics that for over two decades have been widely researched and used in various fields of science. In this paper a survey of DE and PSO applications for problems related with COVID-19 pandemic that were rapidly published in 2020 is presented from two different points of view: 1. practitioners seeking the appropriate method to solve particular problem, 2. experts in metaheuristics that are interested in methodological details, inter comparisons between different methods, and the ways for improvement. The effectiveness and popularity of DE and PSO is analyzed in the context of other metaheuristics used against COVID-19. It is found that in COVID-19 related studies: 1. DE and PSO are most frequently used for calibration of epidemiological models and image-based classification of patients or symptoms, but applications are versatile, even interconnecting the pandemic and humanities; 2. reporting on DE or PSO methodological details is often scarce, and the choices made are not necessarily appropriate for the particular algorithm or problem; 3. mainly the basic variants of DE and PSO that were proposed in the late XX century are applied, and research performed in recent two decades is rather ignored; 4. the number of citations and the availability of codes in various programming languages seems to be the main factors for choosing metaheuristics that are finally used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据