4.4 Article

Multidrug-resistant Raoultella ornithinolytica misidentified as Klebsiella oxytoca carrying blaOXA β-lactamases: antimicrobial profile and genomic characterization

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 203, 期 9, 页码 5755-5761

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02515-z

关键词

Raoultella ornithinolytica; Antimicrobial resistance; Extended spectrum carbapenemases; Plasmid mediated resistance; Nosocomial infection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Class D beta-lactamases OXA-232 and OXA-48 were found to hydrolyze penicillin, cephalosporins, and carbapenems, limiting therapeutic options for bacteraemia. The study identified Raoultella ornithinolytica carrying OXA 232 and OXA-48 genes, confirming the results of the beta-lactamases assay. This represents the first report of multidrug resistance R. ornithinolytica in Mexico, highlighting the emergence of OXA producer microorganisms as a significant threat.
Class D beta-lactamases OXA-232 and OXA-48 hydrolyze penicillin, cephalosporins and carbapenems, limiting the pharmacological therapeutics in bacteraemia. OXA producer microorganisms are considered a great emergent threat, especially in nosocomial environments. To determine the resistance profile and genomic characterization of two isolates initially identified as potential carbapenemase-producer Klebsiella oxytoca in a third level hospital. Automated platform BD Phoenix-100 System was used to identify and to biochemically characterize both isolates. Furthermore, the resistance profile was determined through CLSI methods and the whole genome sequences were obtained using Next-Generation Sequencing. Resistance genes were analyzed, and the virtual fingerprinting was determined to corroborate the similarity with related bacteria. Both strains correspond to Raoultella ornithinolytica carrying OXA 232 and OXA-48 genes, confirming the class D beta-lactamases assay results. Here, we present the genetic and phenotypic analysis of multidrug resistance R. ornithinolytica, representing the first report in Mexico.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据