4.7 Article

Concentration addition and independent action assessments of the binary mixtures of four toxicants on zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) mortality

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2021.105934

关键词

Invasive mussel; Mixture toxicity; Potassium chloride; EarthTec QZ; Niclosamide; Clam-Trol CT-2

资金

  1. U.S. Geological Survey
  2. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researches focused on the synergistic effects of toxicant mixtures in controlling aquatic invasive species have shown that using synergistic combinations can decrease the overall volume and concentration of individual toxicants required for treatments, thereby reducing costs.
Researchers most often focus on individual toxicants when identifying effective chemical control agents for aquatic invasive species; however, toxicant mixtures may elicit synergistic effects. Synergistic effects may decrease required concentrations and shorten exposure durations for treatments. We investigated four toxicants (EarthTec QZ, Clam-Trol CT-2, niclosamide, and potassium chloride) that have been considered to control invasive zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha Pallas, 1771). We determined the toxicity of binary mixtures for five different mixture ratios to adult mussels. We compared our observations to predictions made with concentration addition and independent action paradigms, as based on the dose-response relationships of each individual toxicant. We calculated the model deviation ratio for each combination at the LC50 and LC90 and identified three possible interactions: synergy, antagonism, and additivity. We found that mixtures of niclosamide and Clam-Trol CT-2 were the most synergistic while mixtures that included potassium chloride were largely additive to antagonistic. The use of synergistic combinations has potential to decrease the overall volume and concentration of individual toxicants required for dreissenid mussel treatments, thereby decreasing cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据