4.5 Article

Effects of dietary linolenic acid to linoleic acid ratio on growth performance, proximate composition and fatty acid contents of pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus)

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 12, 页码 6667-6677

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.15536

关键词

docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; fish nutrition; neotropical fish; nutraceutical fish; vegetable oil

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2011/06146-1, 2010/52102-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that using an appropriate LNA/LA ratio in pacu feeds can improve the nutritional quality of the flesh, increase the levels of n-3 fatty acids and EPA/ARA ratios, without compromising the growth performance and flesh composition of the fish.
Freshwater fish have the ability to convert linolenic acid (LNA) into EPA and DHA and linoleic acid (LA) into ARA from elongation and desaturation process. The optimal LNA/LA in aquafeeds formulated with vegetable oils can improve the n-3/n-6 ratio in fish flesh. This study aimed at determining the effects of varying dietary LNA/LA ratios on the growth and proximate composition and fatty acids content in the flesh of pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus. Juvenile pacu (110 +/- 1.6 g) were fed for 60 days with diets containing varying levels of sunflower (SO) and linseed (LO) oils (100SO; 75SO:25LO; 50SO:50LO; 25SO:75LO; 100LO), and performance and proximate composition and fatty acids contents of fish flesh were analysed. Experimental diets did not affect fish growth performance. Although the EPA and DHA content were lower in the fish fed the experimental diets than control diet (fish oil), the complete replacement of fish oil by an approximate proportion of 12SO:88LO, in an optimal LNA/LA ratio (2.2-2.4), represents an improvement in nutraceutical quality of the flesh for human consumption. Fish-fed ideal LNA/LA ratio diets have higher total n-3 fatty acids contents, and higher n-3/n-6 and EPA/ARA ratios, without hampering fish performance and flesh proximate composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据