4.5 Article

Effects of stocking density on the aquaculture performance of diploid and triploid, Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas and Portuguese oyster C. angulata in warm water aquaculture

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 12, 页码 6268-6279

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.15489

关键词

Crassostrea spp; fatty acids; growth performance; ploidy; survival rate

资金

  1. Guangdong Provincial Department of Education [2017KCXTD014]
  2. China Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [CARS-49]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that C. gigas has a growth advantage over C. angulata in Shantou waters, oysters at low stocking density generally outperformed those at high stocking density, and lipid composition of oysters is not affected by ploidy and stocking density.
The Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and the Portuguese oyster (C. angulata) are important oyster species for commercial aquaculture. In this study, three stocking density regimes, including 20, 30 and 40 oysters/basket, were used to study the effects of stocking density on growth performance, survival rate and lipid nutritional quality of diploid and triploid C. gigas and C. angulata. The experiment lasted 163 days, from to 22 November 2011 to 3 April 2012. The main findings of this study are as follows: (1) C. gigas has growth advantage over C. angulata in Shantou waters; (2) geographic origin of the oysters has an impact on the overall performance of diploid and triploid oysters; (3) triploids are generally no growth and survival advantage over diploids in spring and summer; (4) oysters at low stocking density were generally outperformed those at high stocking density; (5) lipid composition of oysters is not affected by ploidy and stocking density; (6) in Shantou waters, C. angulata is more nutritious than C. gigas. This study compares the performance of C. gigas and C. angulata triploidy for the first time. The findings of this study can provide useful information to be applied in oysters aquaculture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据