4.5 Article

Antivibriosis and cytotoxicity of Actinobacteria associated with red seaweed Gelidiella acerosa

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 12, 页码 6786-6794

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.15495

关键词

Actinobacteria; antivibrio; cytotoxicity; Gelidiella acerosa

资金

  1. Universitas Gadjah Mada RTA 2020
  2. LPDP Indonesia [2018-2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated ten marine Actinobacteria isolated from red seaweed Gelidiella acerosa for their potential antivibrio activity, showing that five isolates exhibited activity against Vibrio species with potential for controlling vibriosis. The presence of nrps genes in all isolates suggests a potential for bioactive peptide production, while the absence of pks I, II and hmgcr genes indicates a different biosynthetic pathway.
Vibriosis causes a problem in aquaculture and human health. The antibiotic resistance and the limited availability of antimicrobial agents are the driving force for searching for new antivibrio compounds from natural products. Herein, we evaluated ten marine Actinobacteria isolated from red seaweed Gelidiella acerosa for antivibriosis, cytotoxicity and secondary metabolites genes in the way to find a new antivibrio agent. Five Actinobacteria isolates exhibited activity against Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus with MIC ranging from 0.625 to 5 mu g/mu l. All isolates displayed no cytotoxicity against Vero cell line except for isolate DR-2R-115-8. All isolates harbour nrps gene, which might indicate that these isolates have great potential in the production of bioactive peptides while none of the isolates showed the presence of pks I, II and hmgcr genes. Identification of ten isolates of marine Actinobacteria associated with red algae was classified into four genera of Brevibacterium, Nocardiopsis, Allokutzneria and Brachybacterium. Our study revealed that the marine Actinobacteria associated with red algae Gelidiella acerosa were promising sources for controlling vibriosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据