4.7 Article

A comparative transcriptome analysis focusing on immune responses of Asian swamp eel following infection with Aeromonas hydrophila

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 539, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736655

关键词

Monopterus albus; Aeromonas hydrophila; Transcriptome; DEGs; Immune response

资金

  1. Yangtze University Excellent Master?s Thesis Cultivation Program Funding Project [YS2018015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the transcriptomic profile of the Asian swamp eel spleen in response to Aeromonas hydrophila infection, identifying important immune-related pathways. The results provide valuable information for further analysis of the mechanisms underpinning M. albus defenses against A. hydrophila.
Asian swamp eel (Monopterus albus), an economically important fish species in China and other Asian countries, is susceptible to Aeromonas hydrophila infection. A deeper understanding of the Asian swamp eel immune system and its genes related to the response to bacterial infection is necessary for disease control in this species. Herein, we analysed the transcriptomic profile of spleen from Asian swamp eel challenged with A. hydrophila by using the Illumina-based paired-end sequencing method. More than 99.39% clean reads were successfully mapped to the reference genome of M. albus, including 1501 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), of which 928 were upregulated and 573 were downregulated. Additionally, 5911 terms were enriched in Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, and 284 pathways were identified in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. The reliability of the transcriptome data was validated by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Enrichment analysis of DEGs identified major immune-related pathways, including Toll-like receptor, complement and coagulation cascades, and T- and B-cell receptor signalling pathways. Our results provide valuable information for further analysis of the mechanisms underpinning M. albus defences against A. hydrophila.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据