4.7 Article

Energy, exergy, and economic analysis of tubular solar air heater with porous material: An experimental study

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117294

关键词

Solar air heater; Tubular; Flat; Porous material; Energy and exergy; Double and single-pass; Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that the solar air heater with a new design tubular absorber performs better in energy efficiency, output air temperature, and energy gain compared to the flat plate air heater. Additionally, utilizing porous material and a double pass can further enhance the performance of the tubular heater.
The performance of solar air heater of having a new design tubular absorber of adjacent parallel tubes called tubular is investigated experimentally via energy, exergy, energy payback time, exergoeconomic, and enviroeconomic approaches. Moreover, the impact of utilizing porous material on the tubular heat performance is analyzed and compared to flat plate air heater at air mass flow rates; 0.075, 0.05, and 0.025 kg/s for single and double passes. Results indicate that the tubular heater has higher net energy gain, output air temperature, energy and exergy efficiencies, and smaller energy loss compared to the flat heater. Using porous material and double pass increases the output air temperature of tubular air heater by 3.4 degrees C and flat one by 17.7 degrees C at 0.025 kg/s. Moreover, utilizing porous material with the tubular heater at 0.075 kg/s enhances the energy efficiency by 3.5% and 8.9% and exergy efficiency by 8.2% and 0.9% for single and double pass, respectively. Air pumping power of the tubular heater is greater than flat but its value is very small to influence the tubular net useful energy. Finally, the tubular air heater is more effective compared to flat based on energy payback time, energy cost, exergoeconomic, and enviroeconomic parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据