A comparison of parallel and colliding jet arrays in a compact vapour compression heat sink for electronics cooling

The present work compares the cooling performances of two different multiple orifice spray cooling strategies driven by a compact R-134a vapour compression loop equipped with a small-scale oil-free linear compressor. The strategies - an array of parallel sprays that impinge at a 90 degrees with the heated surface and an array of oblique jets that collide against each other to form an impinging spray cone - are compared in terms of the number of orifices in the array, nozzle-to-surface distance, inter-nozzle distance, thermal load and temperature of the heat rejection medium. The comparisons are made for equivalent orifice flow restrictions and the same mass flow rate of 1.36 g/s at the lowest thermal load. For a hot end temperature of 25 degrees C, a maximum average heat transfer coefficient of 29.0 kW/m2K was achieved with a 5-parallel spray configuration with a 9.84-mm nozzle-to-surface distance. The maximum heat flux sustained by the system, 41.6 W/cm2, was achieved with a 3-colliding jet scheme with a nozzle-to-surface distance of 23.84 mm. To shed some light on the underlying heat transfer mechanisms, images extracted from high-speed video are used to show the interaction between the droplets, the liquid film and the heated surface. The refrigeration system performance parameters, such as the coefficient of performance and the compressor electrical power consumption are mildly affected by the spray characteristics.

Automated summary

This study compares the cooling performances of two different multiple orifice spray cooling strategies driven by a compact R-134a vapor compression loop equipped with a small-scale oil-free linear compressor. It found that different spray structures and parameters can achieve different heat transfer performance, and the spray characteristics have a mild effect on the performance parameters of the refrigeration system.