4.7 Article

An implicit Heat-Pulse-Probe method for measuring the soil ice content

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117186

关键词

Soil ice content; Thermal conductivity; Heat pulse method; Frost heave; Frozen soil

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020YJS107]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51979002, 41731281]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new heat-pulse method with an average accuracy of around 3% was proposed in this study to measure soil ice content, addressing the challenge of real-time monitoring in cold regions. The method involves a doubleprobe sensor and calibration to establish a relation between the relation area and soil ice content, with successful verification on three types of soil.
Soil ice content increases with time during the freezing process, thus frequently causing severe frost heave of subgrade or foundation in the cold region. It is a lasting challenge to implement real-time monitoring of soil ice content. In this study, a new heat-pulse method with an average accuracy of around 3% was proposed to measure soil ice content. This method was implemented by the following steps: (1) A heat pulse method with a doubleprobe sensor, i.e., one heating probe and one measurement probe was used; (2) In the calibration, the relation area after a heat-pulse action was measured on four samples with different initial water contents and at eight negative environmental temperatures. (3) On the calibrated data, an approximate function was fitted to characterize the monotonic relation between the relation area and soil ice content; (4) In application, the relation area value and environmental temperature were measured for each frozen sample, and the measurements were substituted into the approximate function to calculate the soil ice content. The effectiveness of the new method was verified by the test on three types of soil, including a silty clay, a sand loam, and a sand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据