4.7 Article

Highly stable TiOF monolayer as anode material for the applications of Li/ Na-ion batteries

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 574, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151296

关键词

First-principle; Li-and Na-ion batteries; TiOF; 2D anode materials

资金

  1. Research Grants of Startup Foundation of Shanghai Normal University, China [309-AC7001-21-003041]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China [19ZR1437300, 21ZR1446400]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [22175119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through density functional theory, 2D TiOF as an anode for ion batteries was investigated. TiOF was found to be thermodynamically stable at 1000K with high specific capacities and theoretical energy densities for Li and Na, low diffusion barriers for adsorbed Li/Na ions, and preserved metallic features and structural integrity during ion intercalation process, making it an appealing choice for rechargeable Li/Na-ion batteries.
In this work, we investigated 2D TiOF as anode for the applications of ion-battery with density functional theory. TiOF monolayer can be exfoliated from bulk structure with very small exfoliation energy of 0.74 J/m2. It is thermodynamically stable at 1000 K according to the ab-initio molecular dynamics simulation. High specific capacities for Li and Na are expected to be 970 mAh/g. The corresponding theoretical energy densities are 2160 and 1972 mWh/g, respectively, which are much higher than some reported 2D material anode analogues. Furthermore, the diffusion barrier of the adsorbed Li/Na ions are predicted to be 0.15/0.14 eV, indicating that TiOF has an ultrahigh rate capacity. During the Li/Na ions intercalation process, the metallic feature and structural integrity of TiOF remains preserved which gives rise to good battery operating cycle and well electronic conductivity. These results indicate that TiOF can be served as an appealing anode for rechargeable both Li/Na-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据