4.7 Article

Mechanistic insights into the conversion of Ga2O3 to GaN using TGA experiments and DFT modeling

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 560, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150015

关键词

TGA experiment; DFT modeling; Ga2O3; GaN; Nitridation

资金

  1. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies (FRQNT)
  2. Calcul Quebec (calculquebec.ca) and Compute Canada (computecanada.ca)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that NH3 favorably adsorbed on Ga2O3, with nitrogen being attracted towards gallium. The Ga2O3 surface was nitridated to GaN via adsorbed NH2*, NH* and H* intermediates, increasingly stabilized by the surface, preventing their early desorption, and testifying of the positive nitrogen (N) atom insertion into the crystal.
TG experiments and DFT calculations were used to investigate the mechanism of gallium oxide nitridation to gallium nitride. The overall conversion of the gas-solid reaction can be best described by a modified integrated model that accounts for diffusion influence at high temperatures and conversions. For that model, an apparent activation energy of 154 kJ mol(-1) and a reaction order for Ga2O3 of n = 0.36 were estimated. NH3 favorably adsorbed on Ga2O3 without any energy barrier in which the nitrogen is attracted towards gallium (Ga-N). The Ga2O3 surface was nitridated to GaN via adsorbed NH2*, NH* and H* intermediates, obtained through NH3* dissociation, increasingly stabilized by the surface, preventing their early desorption, and testifying of the positive nitrogen (N) atom insertion into the crystal. The N-H bond became harder to break, increasing the dissociation reaction and activation energies. The first NH2* dissociation to NH* was a limiting step, with a high activation energy of 2.81 eV. The second limiting step was the formation of the third H2O molecule with an activation energy of 3.07 eV. According to the observations, the first layer of GaN was organized towards the wurtzite crystal structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据