4.7 Article

Fabrication of BiOBr/MoS2/graphene oxide composites for efficient adsorption and photocatalytic removal of tetracycline antibiotics

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 550, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149342

关键词

BiOBr; MoS2/GO; Adsorption; Photocatalytic degradation; Antibiotics removal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21964006]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2020JJ4640]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [20A050]
  4. Scientific Research Found of Changsha University [SF1934]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The BiOBr/MoS2/GO heterojunction composites showed excellent photocatalytic activity for oxytetracycline degradation, achieving degradation rates over 98% for multiple antibiotics under visible light irradiation within 40 minutes. Radical trapping experiments revealed the crucial roles of photogenerated holes, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide radicals in the photocatalytic OTC degradation process, and a possible transformation pathway and mechanism were proposed based on the investigation of intermediates.
Bismuth oxybromide/molybdenum disulfide/graphene oxide (BiOBr/MoS2/GO) heterojunction composites were fabricated to modulate the adsorption ability and photocatalytic degradation performance toward oxytetracycline (OTC). The flowerlike BiOBr/MoS2/GO composites demonstrated excellent photocatalytic activies for the OTC degradation. Specifically, OTC, tetracycline, chlorotetracycline, and doxycycline were simultaneously removed with degradation rates higher than 98% under visible light irradiation within 40 min. Radical trapping experiments indicated that photogenerated holes (h(+)), hydroxyl radicals ((OH)-O-center dot), and superoxide radicals (O-center dot(2-)) played crucial roles in photocatalytic OTC degradation. Further, Possible transformation pathway and photocatalytic mechanism were proposed by investigating the intermediates in OTC degradation process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据