4.7 Article

Extremely thin interlayer of multi-element intermetallic compound between Sn-based solders and FeCoNiMn high-entropy alloy

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 558, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149945

关键词

High-entropy Alloy; Lead-free solder; Wettability; Multi-element intermetallic compound; IMC Suppression

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [109-2222-E-035 -008 -MY2]
  2. Ultra High Resolution Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Instrument Resource Center [EM002800, MOST 110-2731-M-009-001]
  3. Feng Chia University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that FCNM has better contact angles and diffusion rates with SAC305 and SB58, along with low dissolution rate and extremely thin interlayer, making it a promising material for diffusion barrier in three-dimensional integrated circuits with small solder volumes.
We examined the interfacial reactions between Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu (SAC305) alloy/FeCoNiMn (FCNM) highentropy alloy (HEA) and Sn-58Bi (SB58)/FCNM. FCNM exhibits a single phase with Fe, Co, Ni, and Mn solid solutions, and the FCC phase has a lattice constant of 3.601 angstrom, as determined by X-ray diffraction. Further, SAC305 and SB58 exhibit slightly better contact angles and spread rates on FCNM than that on Cu, which is consistent with their interfacial energies calculated by density functional theory simulations. Additionally, there is an extremely thin interlayer between SB58/FCNM (0.128 pm thickness), which is a multi-element intermetallic compound with 13.42%, 7.89%, 5.26%, 5.79%, and 67.63% (at.%) of Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, and Sn, respectively, expressed by the (Fe, Co, Ni, Mn)Sn2 intermetallic compound. The dissolution rate of FCNM into Sn was very low during the reflow process of 20 min. The findings indicate that FCNM is a promising material as a diffusion barrier between Sn-based solder/Cu solder joints with a small solder volume in a three-dimensional integrated circuit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据