4.7 Article

Interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy FMEA application to improve risk evaluation process of tool changing manipulator

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107192

关键词

Failure mode and effects analysis; Interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets; IVq-ROFWG operator; IVq-ROFWMSM operator; ARAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new scientific risk assessment method which combines different fuzzy evaluation methods to address the deficiencies in the traditional FMEA method, and introduces the concept of sub-risk factors to enhance the practicality of evaluation results. The rationality and effectiveness of the method are validated through consistency inspection and expert information fusion in a real case study involving tool changing manipulator of tool magazine.
Taking actions to prevent the occurrence of failure in advance, rather than improving reliability through post-mortem testing is crucial for improvement of products' quality and efficiency. As a typical prevention reliability analysis method, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has an innate advantage in conducting this improvement. However, traditional FMEA also contains some deficiencies in rating risks, weighting risk factors and ranking failure modes. In this paper, a scientific risk evaluation method capable of solving these deficiencies is proposed, which combines interval valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy-deviation maximization method (IVq-ROF-DMM) with interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy-additive ratio assessment (IVq-ROF-ARAS) method. Moreover, the concept of sub-risk factors is developed to make evaluation results more practical. To make experts' evaluation information more consistent, a consistency inspection and improvement process is conducted and experts' evaluation information are fused by IVq-ROF weighted average (IVq-ROFWG) operator and IVq-ROF weighted Maclaurin symmetric mean (IVq-ROFWMSM) operator. Finally, a real case vis-a-vis tool changing manipulator of tool magazine is illustrated, and discussion results indicate that the proposed method is rational and valid. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据