4.6 Article

Unity quantum efficiency in III-nitride quantum wells at low temperature: Experimental verification by time-resolved photoluminescence

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 119, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0055368

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study confirms the 100% internal quantum efficiency of III-N quantum wells at low temperatures through time-resolved photoluminescence measurements. It suggests that when radiative recombination dominates, the low-temperature IQE of a quantum well is 100%. By examining temperature-dependent measurements, the presence of nonradiative recombination in quantum wells at low temperature can be determined, enabling absolute IQE measurements.
Using time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) measurements, we present an experimental verification for 100% internal quantum efficiency (IQE) of III-N quantum wells at low temperatures. Conventional IQE measurements, such as temperature- and power-dependent PL, require a low-temperature normalization, where usually an IQE of 100% is assumed. This assumption neglects remaining nonradiative recombination that may be present even at cryogenic temperatures. From time-resolved PL measurements, the effective charge carrier decay time and the lifetime of radiative recombination can be evaluated separately. We state that the low-temperature IQE of a quantum well corresponds to 100%, whenever the effective charge carrier decay is dominated only by a radiative recombination. In this case, the temperature-dependent measurements show a synchronous rise of the effective lifetimes together with the radiative lifetimes, since only the radiative lifetime increases with temperature in a 2D system. At the same time, nonradiative processes are thermally activated, which results in a decreasing lifetime with temperature. Thereby, absolute IQE measurements become possible, since we provide a robust indicator for the absence of nonradiative recombination in quantum wells at low temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据