4.6 Article

Optical characterization and photo-electrical measurement of luminescent solar concentrators based on perovskite quantum dots integrated into the thiol-ene polymer

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 119, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0059847

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61974078]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY21F040002]
  3. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020A1515010432]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang [SJLY2021012]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Ningbo University [IF2021157]
  6. Research Foundation of Marine Biotechnology and Marine Engineering Discipline Group
  7. K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the integration of perovskite quantum dots with thiol-ene polymer for LSC applications, investigating the impact of different QDs concentrations on LSC performance and achieving optimal optical efficiency and power conversion efficiency.
The luminescent solar concentrator (LSC) has attracted worldwide attention as a sunlight manager for harvesting solar energy in building integrated photovoltaic structures. However, until now the relatively low optical efficiency (eta(opt)) still severely hinders the advancement of the LSCs. In this work, we report the perovskite quantum dots (QDs) integrated into the thiol-ene polymer for LSC applications. After encapsulated by the thiol-ene polymer, the CsPbBr3 QDs exhibit a slight blue-shift of the PL peak position and increasing FWHM because of the dielectric screen effect. With the different QDs' concentrations from 8.3x10(-3) to 2.5x10(-2)mg/ml, the LSC performance is evaluated by the direct optical characterization and the indirect photo-electrical measurement in detail. After coupling the PV cells, the as-fabricated LSC shows the optimal optical efficiency of 2.11% and the power conversion efficiency of 1.06%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据