4.6 Article

Experimental realization of noncyclic geometric gates with shortcut to adiabaticity in a superconducting circuit

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 118, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0049967

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0301802]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61521001, 11890704]
  3. Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province [2018B030326001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, noncyclic geometric gates were experimentally realized, showing that smaller rotation angles correspond to shorter evolution time and higher fidelity. The superiority of noncyclic geometric gates in terms of faster and more robust quantum computation makes them promising candidates for practical applications.
Possessing the noise-resilience feature, geometric phases have become important in robust quantum computation. Gates based on the Abelian and non-Abelian geometric phases have been experimentally demonstrated in different physical systems. However, previous proposals require cyclic evolution with a constant operation time even for small rotation angles, which set a limit to the gate operation time. Here, we experimentally realize noncyclic geometric gates, where the cyclic condition is removed and the operation time is proportional to the rotation angle. With the adiabatic process sped up by shortcut to adiabaticity, the fidelities of a noncyclic geometric gate characterized by randomized benchmarking are above 99.5%. Comparing with the dynamic scheme, we demonstrate the robustness of our gate against control instability in the experiment. Moreover, our results indicate that the noncyclic geometric gate with a smaller rotation angle corresponds to a shorter evolution time and higher fidelity. As small rotation angles are essential in the quantum algorithm, the superiority of noncyclic geometric gates makes them promising candidates in fast and robust quantum computation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据