4.6 Article

Photocatalytic degradation mechanism of Ce-loaded ZnO catalysts toward methyl green dye pollutant

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-021-04602-w

关键词

ZnO; Doping; Bandgap; Methyl green; And photocatalysis

资金

  1. King Khalid University [R.G.P2/87/41]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the photocatalytic activity of Ce:ZnO nanocrystals towards the degradation of methyl green dye molecules under black light irradiation was investigated. Ce:ZnO samples were prepared by a simple one-pot method with different Ce concentrations, and their crystal parameters and band gap changes were analyzed. The morphology and composition of Ce:ZnO nanocrystals were studied using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray techniques. Comparisons of the photocatalytic performances between pure ZnO, Ce:ZnO, and CeO2-ZnO composites were made, showing significant improvements in degradation efficiency with the addition of Ce.
We report the photocatalytic activity of cerium-doped zinc oxide (Ce:ZnO) nanocrystals, toward the rapid degradation of methyl green dye molecules under black light (lambda = 376 nm) irradiation. The Ce:ZnO samples are prepared by simple one-pot preparation methods with different Ce concentrations. The crystal parameters of the Ce:ZnO are derived from X-ray diffraction analysis and the corresponding band gap changes are probed with diffuse reflectance spectra. Raman spectral analysis reveals the vibrational properties of Ce:ZnO samples. Following that, the morphology and compositional analysis of Ce:ZnO nanocrystals are performed with scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray techniques, respectively. Finally, the photocatalytic performances of Ce:ZnO are compared and the role of Ce toward the improved photocatalytic activity of ZnO are discussed. It has been found that 68 and 98% of degradation is achieved for pure ZnO and Ce:ZnO, respectively. On the other hand in the composites form, CeO2-ZnO exhibits 100% degradation in just 30 min.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据