4.6 Article

Ternary nanocomposite of ZnFe2O4/α-Fe2O3/ZnO; synthesis via coprecipitation method and physical properties characterization

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-021-04607-5

关键词

ZnFe2O4/alpha-Fe2O3/ZnO nanocomposite; Spinel nanoparticles; Ternary nanocomposite powder; Calcination effects; Optical transition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ternary transition metal oxide nanocomposite powder was successfully synthesized using coprecipitation method, with nanocrystals exhibiting good crystallization and efficient absorption of UV and visible light, making it more suitable for photocatalytic activities compared to individual components.
ZnFe2O4/alpha-Fe2O3/ZnO, the ternary transition metal oxide nanocomposite powder was successfully synthesized by facile coprecipitation method directly from metalorganic precursors within 4 h of processing time considerably shorter than other reported methods. To study the post-synthesis thermal treatment effects on physical properties, calcination process was applied at 500, 600, and 700 degrees C individually for one hour. The structure, phase formation, morphology, and optical features of the samples were characterized by employing powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and UV-visible spectroscopy. The results confirm the synthesis of pure and homogeneous composites comprised of nanoparticles with good crystallization in a narrow range of crystallite sizes between 25-39 nm. The particle sizes also were estimated between 48-93 nm. The optical property was studied by recording the absorbance spectrum from 200 to 700 nm. The absorption pattern illustrates the nanocomposite can be driven by UV and visible wavelengths with good efficiency that is more desirable for intended applications like photocatalytic activities compare with the individual components. By applying Tauc's method, the allowed direct bandgap and indirect bandgap of the prepared nanocomposite were estimated to be around 2.28 and 2.75 eV, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据