4.6 Article

Photothermal effect of graphene/polymer smart nanocomposites under NIR stimuli

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-021-04900-3

关键词

Graphene nanosheets (GNSs); GNSs; polymer smart nanocomposites; Photothermal conversion; Photothermal effect; Near-infrared (NIR)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12102314, 51974217]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2019IA003, 2018IB007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a generalized driving force induced photothermal conversion based on an energy balance relation modified by Maxwell effective medium theory, aiming to describe the photothermal effect and indicate the photothermal conversion process. The effects of GNSs' size and mass concentration, light intensity of NIR irradiation, and film thickness of GNSs/polymer nanocomposites on the photothermal conversion are discussed in this paper.
Many studies have shown that a low mass loading graphene nanosheets (GNSs) in a polymer matrix can provide the nanocomposite with high photothermal conversion efficiency in the near-infrared (NIR) region. However, how to accurately control the photothermal effect of graphene/polymer smart nanocomposites is still a key to its application in biomedicine, micromechanical systems and other fields. Aiming to describe the photothermal effect and indicate the photothermal conversion process, a generalized driving force induced photothermal conversion is introduced based on an energy balance relation modified by Maxwell effective medium theory. The effects of GNSs' size and mass concentration, light intensity of NIR irradiation and film thickness of GNSs/polymer nanocomposites on the photothermal conversion are all discussed in this paper. Some critical values (such as GNSs' size and mass concentration, GNSs/polymer nanocomposites film thickness) of the photothermal conversion are predicted, and their influence mechanisms on photothermal conversion are also clarified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据