4.7 Article

Comparative metabolomics analysis reveals the metabolic regulation mechanism of yellow pigment overproduction by Monascus using ammonium chloride as a nitrogen source

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 105, 期 16-17, 页码 6369-6379

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11395-8

关键词

Monascus; Yellow pigment; Metabolomics; Monascin; Ankaflavin; Ammonium chloride

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a comparative metabolomics strategy to reveal the metabolic regulatory mechanism of Monascus yellow pigments (MYPs) overproduction, discovering metabolic biomarkers/modules closely associated with MYP biosynthesis. It also demonstrated the impact of exogenous glucose and lactate on MYP production and revealed potential engineering targets for improving commercial MYP production efficiency.
Monascus yellow pigments (MYPs), as food colorants, are of great interest to the food industry, because of their beneficial biological activities. In this study, a comparative metabolomics strategy revealed the metabolic regulatory mechanism of MYP overproduction, comparing ammonium chloride with peptone as nitrogen sources. Metabolomics-based multivariate regression modeling showed that metabolic biomarkers/modules, such as glucose, lactate, and the pentose phosphate (PP) pathway, were closely associated with the biosynthesis of MYPs. Exogenous addition of glucose increased production of MYPs, whereas lactate reduced it. Inhibition of the PP pathway with dehydroepiandrosterone decreased MYP production, while increasing the shunting production of orange and red pigments. All these treatments significantly changed the expression profiles of the pigment biosynthetic gene cluster and the mycelial morphology. Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of elucidating the mechanism of MYP biosynthesis by comprehensive metabolomics analysis, as well as discovering potential engineering targets of efficiency improvements to commercial MYP production. Graphical abstract

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据