4.7 Article

A four-way enhanced numerical manifold method for crack propagation and failure analysis of rock slopes

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 623-643

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.02.025

关键词

Numerical manifold method; Singular integral; Critical length criterion; Cone complementary model; Crack propagation

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering grant [2019-KY-02]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [16214519, N_HKUST621/18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The four-way enhanced numerical manifold method (NMM) improves the simulation of crack propagation in rock media and progressive failure of jointed rock slopes by enhancing local approximation, numerical integration accuracy, cracking criterion, and contact formulation. Examples demonstrate the performance and application prospect of the presented NMM in stability and failure analysis of jointed rock slopes.
A four-way enhanced numerical manifold method (NMM) is proposed in order to simulate crack propagation in rock media and progressive failure of jointed rock slopes. Specifi-cally, the original NMM is improved in the following four aspects: (1) An enriched lo -cal approximation is employed to characterize singularity and discontinuity of the dis-placement/stress fields near the crack tip. (2) A modified generalized Duffy transforma-tion is proposed to improve the accuracy of numerical integration associated with the 1/ r and 1 / root r singularities. (3) A critical length cracking criterion is introduced to determine propagation length and direction for both tensile-shear and compressive-shear cracks in rock mass. (4) A cone-complementary-based contact formulation is incorporated to re-solve the cohesive/frictional contact phenomena between discontinuous interfaces more accurately. Some examples demonstrate the performance and application prospect of the presented NMM in stability and failure analysis of the jointed rock slopes. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据