4.7 Article

Neutron optics: New algorithm based on Green's functions for simulating waveguides with Dirichlet boundary conditions

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 694-715

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.09.007

关键词

Neutron optics; Waveguides; Dirichlet boundary conditions; Unbounded domain; Meshless algorithm; Greens functions

资金

  1. Universidad Complutense de Madrid [FECI-EU-17-06]
  2. Ministry of Science and Innovation [PGC2018-094684-B-C21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The new method efficiently computes scalar wave propagation with Dirichlet boundary conditions, handling various scenarios and utilizing Fast Fourier Transform for simulations, showing superior performance in terms of running time and memory load compared to Finite Differences Methods.
We present a new, efficient and robust method for computing scalar wave propagation for those cases in which Dirichlet boundary conditions play a key role. The algorithm is versatile and it allows to treat reflection, diffraction, waveguiding regime, scattering and free propagation. The analysis is based upon a representation for a slow neutron wavefunction in terms of the incoming wave and integrals, along the boundaries of an unbounded domain, involving a Green's function and certain auxiliary functions (warranting the Dirichlet boundary conditions). The analysis involves Fourier and Hilbert transforms defined only on the boundaries and enables to exploit the detailed advantages of Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to perform simulations. Our algorithm proves to be highly effective both in terms in running time and memory load, compared to those based on Finite Differences Methods (FDM). Moreover, since the value of the field at each point may be calculated independently, this algorithm allows parallelization in a natural way. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据